hapa

Nov 22

blackhoodie:

On Nov. 17, 2009, Earth will pass through the 1466 stream again, but this time closer to the center. Based on the number of meteors observed in 2008, Vaubaillon can estimate the strength of the coming display: five hundred or more Leonids per hour. The times provided are optimal view hours for PST, but the Leonid Meteor shower may last up to two days so there may be other times for optimal viewing.
(via randompictures)

I saw some a couple weeks ago.

blackhoodie:

On Nov. 17, 2009, Earth will pass through the 1466 stream again, but this time closer to the center. Based on the number of meteors observed in 2008, Vaubaillon can estimate the strength of the coming display: five hundred or more Leonids per hour. The times provided are optimal view hours for PST, but the Leonid Meteor shower may last up to two days so there may be other times for optimal viewing.

(via randompictures)

I saw some a couple weeks ago.

davidkendall:

One of my favorite photos of vintage New York City.  This is Times Square, circa 1950.
(source unknown)

davidkendall:

One of my favorite photos of vintage New York City. This is Times Square, circa 1950.

(source unknown)

The CrunchPad: How different would the world be?

marco:

Fusion Garage, the soon-to-be-subsidiary of TechCrunch that’s building the OS for the CrunchPad, has a comically ridiculous motto:

What if the browser could boot without an OS? How different would the world be?

I’ll try to answer this question.

Technically, they’re probably just bundling a minimal, fast-booting OS (with a fast-booting BIOS, presumably, that can quickly wake from sleep) with a browser as the only application. They’re most likely not writing their own kernel or basic frameworks, since they can just use GNU stuff and Linux. And they’re definitely not writing their own browser, because that would be insurmountable by such a small team (and really stupid). They talk about running Flash, so it’s almost definitely just a stripped-down Linux distribution with the minimum support required to run a GUI, a custom-chromed Firefox (or Konquerer?), and an on-screen keyboard. So the OS is there — it just hopefully gets out of your way and you don’t need to know about it.

It seems like the worst combination of two products:

Geeks think both products are awesome and will take over the world, but neither have come close. The CrunchPad is much more like a slate-tablet than a netbook, but without the software flexibility. It has the terrible hardware of netbooks with the impracticality of not having a keyboard. If you’re going to spend $300 on a small, limited computer that you’ll only ever use for web browsing, I don’t see why you’d get a CrunchPad instead of a netbook. (An iPod Touch would probably be a much better choice than either.)

The presumption that this will change the world, at least on the software side, seems predicated on an implied shortcoming of browsers requiring operating systems. I don’t see why this is a problem, nor do I see how this would solve such a problem even if it existed.

Back to the original question: How different will the world be if they actually release this thing?

Well, Michael Arrington will have less money and a handful of geeks will have a $300 slate-netbook that they use a few times before it gets tossed in their gadget pile because everything it does is better accomplished with something else.

That’s about it.

dugange:

On the corner of 80th and Columbus.

If this is from the West Side Highway accident, why would NYC do this?  Was it definitely a drunk driving PSA?  Or was it just placed there randomly?  Why not take it to the tow impound?  This is messing with my mind a little… clearly.

dugange:

On the corner of 80th and Columbus.

If this is from the West Side Highway accident, why would NYC do this?  Was it definitely a drunk driving PSA?  Or was it just placed there randomly?  Why not take it to the tow impound?  This is messing with my mind a little… clearly.

Electronic Medical Records Don’t Save Money

jayparkinsonmd:

hjluks:

“We analyzed whether more computerized hospitals had lower costs of care or administration, or better quality,” the authors wrote.

The results: “Hospitals on the ‘Most Wired’ list performed no better than others on quality, costs, or administrative costs.”

Himmelstein’s study is the second this week that disputes the benefits of EMR.

via healthleadersmedia.com

Does this surprise anyone? Disappointing, of course. Right now EMRs exist as siloed, tethered pockets of data and are being utilized primarily as an expensive, poorly designed, digital cousin of the paper record kept by most physicians.

Cost, quality and improved care will follow when these systems are better designed, OPEN SOURCE, more affordable, inter-operable and connected on a nationwide level. Then the API developer community will see to it that the data can be scrubbed and analyzed in a manner that can benefit everyone.

Also, don’t forget that medical data must be web accessible to the patient and follow the patient no matter where they go in the United States to receive care.

Until the patient owns their record, and applications for viewing and parsing that data (by doctors and patients) improve… all those fancy computers and databases installed at medical centers (and mandated by the government) is just raw infrastructure, and cost.  Extracting value from that infrastructure is yet to come.  It’s “highways vs. traffic” people.  We won’t see service level improvements reliably until we learn to drive down the new roads being paved before us.

todayi:

dugange:

That’s effing blood, people. OMFG!

:(

Was this the car from the accident last night on West Side Highway?  My sister happened upon a scene on WSH – whose description matches what this might be a photo from – shortly after the crash, so soon such that only one police officer had so far responded.  The driver, a young man, was dead on site.  A shame.

todayi:

dugange:

That’s effing blood, people. OMFG!

:(

Was this the car from the accident last night on West Side Highway?  My sister happened upon a scene on WSH – whose description matches what this might be a photo from – shortly after the crash, so soon such that only one police officer had so far responded.  The driver, a young man, was dead on site.  A shame.

Link: Entelligence: Chrome OS, babies, and bathwater -- Engadget -

Some of Gartenberg’s warning-words are fair, however him pointing to his own article about MIDs is unfair.  He sites his own indictment of Intel’s MID definition and strategy as if it’s an example of the errs in Google’s ways. At the end of the MID article he concedes that the iPod touch is a successful example of a “tweener” device.

As for me, I think Chrome OS is trying to figure out what story it must tell to give enough thrust for escape velocity.  Gartenberg is probably right that it isn’t Intel’s definition of what a MID is… afterall, at the price-points those early MID concepts were being offered at were the equivalent of category stillbirth. But today, there are a couple tweener device designs that are not a cellphone replacement (iPod touch), or too big for the pocket and at the same time not a laptop (Kindle), that users are starting to find compelling and will continue to do so in the future.

All this market testing is healthy and great “platforms” will win the day.  What else should Google be spending their cash on?

Nov 21

Best Buy released a marketing video showing how Rocketboost enabled products can help -

A bit corporate and simplified, but you weren’t expecting tear-downs and spectrum plots now were you? There are never too many ways to tell a good story…


Vienna VA.

Welcome to Virginia. 77 in a 65. Lame asses.